- Business Hours.
- A Defense of Christianity!
- Instrumentación 3: Presión (Instrumentacion Industrial) (Spanish Edition).
- Fangs of Gold.
- The Privateer.
- The Lovely Kittengirls of Mew Orleans;
- The Sibling Effect: What the Bonds Among Brothers and Sisters Reveal About Us.
The book also contains a useful bibliography which, again, has been updated in Philosophical Foundations. May 13, Franklin Peach rated it it was amazing Shelves: What a breath of fresh air Scaling the Secular City: Moreland was to read while living in our 'God is Dead' culture.
I generally feel comfortable while defending Catholicism to my protestant brothers and sisters, but always felt just a little inadequate when discussing God with agnostics or atheists. This book is a good foray into defending Christianity as a logical conclusion in our hyper-scienced culture. As someone with a Math background I especially liked his appeal to the Kalam argument for the existence of god and the use of a mathematical understanding of infinity to argue the the universe must have a beginning.
Please don't shy away from this book if you don't have an aptitude in math, this is the only area in the book that deals with it and he explains it well enough, it just may seem odd to think that it is possible to have one infinite list larger or smaller than another infinite list. I assure you it is true or much of mathematics is wrong Moreland covers a lot of distance in this relatively short book including but not limited to Evolution, Physicalism only mater exists , The Historicity of the Gospels, The Resurrection of Jesus and Morality. His logic throughout the book is impeccable and you may often be amazed of how the logic of most atheistic arguments lead one in a direction you and most times the atheist themselves do not want to go.
The depth which each topic is covered is sufficient and well footnoted, some of which I will plan to read to dive into some topics with more depth than was covered here. I only took one issue with Moreland when he used Jesus' brothers and sisters to make an argument. I understand that Moreland is not Catholic, but He must know that this would not sit well with us as Mary's Perpetual virginity is Catholic Dogma and he really didn't need to have it in there to make his argument, so I was saddened he felt it necessary to include it.
That small point aside this was a great book that would leave any skeptic questioning their beliefs or lack there of. His chapter 'Science and Christianity' in which he explores the tension between the two, their proper balance, the limits of both and why we should actually put less faith in science than we do again using inescapable logic , was a particularly good one.
A point I will be sure to take with me: Consider this statement, "only what can be known by science or quantified and empirically tested is rational and true" p.
Therefore the statement is not true by it's own standards. That is the type of clear reasoning you can expect from this well written book. Oct 31, Russell rated it liked it. I've spent the last couple of years slowly reading, and re-reading, this book. I chose it because it had a reputation for being one of the strongest works of Christian apologetics out there.
JP Moreland's Web » Scaling The Secular City
Unfortunately, it failed to impress. The book starts out with the classic Kalam cosmological argument for the existence of god. While ultimately not convincing, Moreland at least did an admirable job of presenting the argument, and it made for challenging reading and thought. Unfortunately, the book goes rapi I've spent the last couple of years slowly reading, and re-reading, this book. Unfortunately, the book goes rapidly down hill from there, presenting various arguments that get progressively weaker as the get closer to the Christian god.
I won't go through every chapter here, but I feel the need to mention that the chapters on the historicity of the bible were astonishingly weak. Moreland's arguments couldn't possibly have been convincing to anyone who hadn't already accepted the conclusion. The book doesn't truly hit bottom, however, until the chapter on the relationship between religion and science. Moreland mostly uses the same worn out, ill-informed arguments against evolutionary theory that evolution deniers have been making for decades and which have been debunked be well-informed scientists many times over.
He also grossly mischaracterizes the nature of evolutionary theory. For example, he completely misinterprets Gould and Eldridge's theory of punctuated equilibrium to make it seem like it's some sort of attempt to fill in gaps in the fossil record, which it certainly is not. A person as well educated as Moreland seems to be should know better than to make such outlandish and disingenuous arguments.
It really makes one doubt the sincerity of Moreland's entire book. Does he truly believe all of his own arguments? One has to wonder. I must give credit to Moreland for at least presenting some of the counter arguments to his own theories. This is more than the average work of apologetics attempts. In the long run, however, I was greatly disappointed with a book that came with such a strong reputation. Is this the best defense that Christianity can have? Perhaps it is, and that is something that should give Christians food for thought!
In this book, Moreland makes all efforts to make Christianity credible with several arguments. His arguments are very well laid an especially in what is concerning to the existence of God and for Jesus' deity and resurrection. Moreland also provides very good answers to objections to Christian theism, and discussions of four key issues: I think that Moreland explains very well the the In this book, Moreland makes all efforts to make Christianity credible with several arguments. I think that Moreland explains very well the theories of the Kalam theory, what made this more interesting to me.
The book has some very good insights and strengths I liked specially Moreland explanation of apologetics.
- Music with the Under-Fours!
- See a Problem?.
- No Account?;
- Scaling the Secular City: A Defense of Christianity - J. P. Moreland - Google Книги.
- Hiking the Vortexes?
As he puts it: First, Scripture command us to defend the faith and gives us several examples of such activity. Second, apologetics can help remove barriers to faith and thus aid unbelievers in embracing the gospel. For one thing, it gives confidence that faith is true and reasonable and also apologetics can encourage spiritual growth. Fourth, apologetics can help to health in the culture at large. For example, in the formation of bioethics committees.
With all the resources and information available in this book, I felt very encouraged to engage in the use of apologetics as a tool to bring people to Christ through the presentation of a very reasonable message. I was able to understand that apologetics is much more than defence of the gospel, but above also a presentation of its logical message to the world. Aug 13, Brian Watson rated it really liked it. This isn't the best book on Christian Apologetics that I've read, but it's solid and it holds up well. It was published in Moreland approaches apologetics from a largely philosophical angle, so much of his comprehensive case for Christianity is philosophical in nature.
Perhaps that is why it doesn't seem dated. He does provide some information about the reliability of the New Testament and the historicity of the resurrection.
My only complaints are that aside from those chapters, much of This isn't the best book on Christian Apologetics that I've read, but it's solid and it holds up well. My only complaints are that aside from those chapters, much of the book doesn't directly argue enough for a distinctively Christian theism. Additionally, the chapters seemed somewhat disjointed. Though each chapter was fine, they didn't seem to lead one into another.
For a similar, but more comprehensive book, I would recommend Douglas Groothuis's Christian Apologetics. But since that book is almost three times the length of this one, this is a good place to start for a philosophically-minded person who wants to explore some good arguments for the truth of the Christian faith.
Dec 02, Sergio Flores rated it it was amazing. This book is excellent! One of my new favorite apologetics books for sure. Moreland tackles the existence of a personal God then talks about the historicity of Jesus and closes the book with objections to Christianity. Laying out all of his arguments clearly, he also deals with some main objections to the arguments and shows how they are not valid. He also deals with other philosophies and points out their flaws, showing how they fail.
A must read for Christians who want to learn more abou This book is excellent! A must read for Christians who want to learn more about the defense of their faith. Jun 09, Todd Stockslager rated it really liked it Shelves: This reads more like a reference book of apologetic arguments than an exegetical defense of Christianity, but as such it is a very valuable reference.
Moreland focuses on philosophical and scientific arguments for God, pulling together most of the great high-level debates on the subject throughout history. Jul 20, Hank Pharis rated it it was ok. This is supposed to be an intermediate level book on apologetics. However my philosophical abilities must be declining because I found some of this challenging. Nevertheless thankful for people like Dr. Moreland, , Grand Rapids, Mich.: Baker Book House pp.
I'll just briefly point out some of its flaws. Moreland opens his book with the kalam cosmological argument drawing from Craig's work. The argument begins by 1 attempting to establish the impossibility of an actual infinite, or at least the impossibility of an infinite past. It then argues that 2 the beginning of the universe must have been caused, and finally that 3 the cause must have been personal. There are flaws in the argument at every step e. Regarding 3 , the sort of changeless causation necessary for a cause for the first event does not require that the cause be a person.
It is also difficult to see how something changeless could be a person. Moreland's argument to the contrary p. In a discussion on science and Christianity, Moreland falsely says p.
Scaling the Secular City: A Defense of Christianity
That may be true of progressive creationism multiple creations over time , but not of creationism proper, which has no explanation for the distribution of fossils in the geological column. Moreland also gives design arguments, arguments from mind, and arguments for the historicity of the New Testament and the resurrection. His moral arguments overlook the view that nihilism is a negligible position. If it is true that there are no values, then there is no reason to act as if that is the case, since any such reason would have to depend on values.
And he flippantly dismisses ethical naturalism without any real argument. Still, it is a well-written book which deserves a fuller critique than I have been able to give here.